7 Hollywood costume disasters that make you look mad: Emma Watson turns into a “cheesy doll”, the most virtual is the “ugh” armor in the last movie!
Hollywood has had many reprehensible mistakes in historical films, which makes me disappointed.
Thinking that Hollywood is the most sophisticated film studio in the world, anyone who doubts it will often “laugh and cry”. Especially when discussing the costume elements in historical films, at first glance they look stunningly gorgeous, but upon closer inspection reveal many unnecessary mistakes. From sloppy patterns, mismatched makeup to images that go against history, here are 7 cases of “purple anger” from Hollywood historical movies – watch them and make them uncomfortable!
1. Was Emma Watson “snubbed” by the Little Women crew? Why was she so cheesy from her outfit to her acting?
In the novel Little Women, the evening dress of the character Meg is described as simple and bland, but in the movie the most chaotic in the world. This outfit is even cumbersome and has a cheesy pink color, making beauty Emma Watson look like the image of a “pink doll”.
2. The Bridgerton beauty is so rebellious that she forgets to curl her hair? It looks beautiful but it’s a big mistake
“Sex Bomb” Bridgerton has many deviations from its historical context, one of which is its unique hair. female protagonist Daphne. During the Regency period (the movie’s setting), ladies often wore their hair in messy buns and curled their bangs. Therefore, Daphne’s “dog-chewing” bangs are a very wrong detail, looking like a modern girl, not nostalgic at all.
3. “Queen” Saoirse Ronan stunned viewers with her passion… piercing, playing this big will ruin the original work?
The beautiful actress Saoirse Ronan once acted extremely well in Mary Queen Of Scots, but was criticized for a reprehensible omission. Specifically, the actress once wore up to 5 earrings at the same time – an unreal fashion style in 16th century Europe. Queen Mary Stuart herself, the original character, never dressed like this in the past.
4. Historical films overuse sexy elements to the point of distorting history. Who says medieval times can be “exposed”?
In the 16th century, women always had to wear a bra under their skirts, not bare shoulders like in the TV series The Tudors< a i=2>. At that time, the neckline was often square, with many layers of skirt underneath. Therefore, the following image of a sexy noble girl is just a fantasy…
5. One more huge flaw in Roman costumes, dressing like this character is definitely a “fake”!
Movie Pompeii (2014) suddenly violates ancient Roman dress code by letting the character use the innocent color purple damn. In the 1st century AD, only the emperor could wear purple fabric, so anyone who dared to use the color faced severe punishment. In the image below, the character Senator Corvus looks like a “traitor” when equipped with purple armor, showing a super harsh mistake.
6. Elle Fanning is stunningly beautiful but is “drowned” by her outfit, and even destroys the old scene
It’s not natural that the biopic Mary Shelley received negative reviews from audiences and critics. Just look at Elle Fanning’s image – if this is out of place and messy, where is the Gothic style, which favors black and red colors, in the early 19th century? Overall, this outfit is “plain”, wasting the beautiful beauty of the female lead.
7. The most absurd thing is that the iron armor is reserved for the “nappy mothers” association, so is it true that you can still go into battle while pregnant?
The Spanish Princess tells the story of the life of Catherine of Aragon, the first wife of King Henry VIII. In one episode, this character was forced to wear armor and go into battle even though he was superior. However, historically there is no reliable evidence of armor specifically for pregnant women. Thinking about carrying a pregnant belly into battle is so wrong, it’s time to design more iron armor!
