The controversy surrounding Beyoncé’s music credits has been ongoing for several years and remains a hot topic in the music community. Recently, songwriter Tiffany Red spoke out about Beyoncé not only taking a significant portion of revenue from music compositions but also imposing unfair agreements on the songwriters working for her.

According to Tiffany Red, Beyoncé has taken advantage of the situation to appropriate 15 to 30% of the publishing royalties from songs she did not author. She also alleged that Beyoncé imposes nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) on songwriters, thereby silencing them from expressing their grievances. This has created a secretive working environment with Beyoncé and threatened the freedom of speech of those working for her.

These controversies are not new. In the past, Beyoncé has faced criticism for not fully disclosing the origins of the music she performs. For example, in the song “Bow Down,” she claimed authorship but later revealed that songwriters Rock City actually penned the track.

Furthermore, there have been multiple instances where other artists such as Robin S. and Kalise have had issues with Beyoncé using their music without consent or prior notification. This has sparked outrage in the music community and raised questions about transparency and fairness in the music industry.

While Beyoncé has frequently faced criticism on this issue, some still support her and believe she has no ill intentions. They argue that these disagreements may stem from misunderstandings or complex agreements within the music industry.

In conclusion, the debate over Beyoncé’s music credits continues to unfold and has generated significant waves in the music community. Clarifying and resolving these disputes will be an important step in promoting transparency and fairness in the music industry.