Renowned singer Beyoncé has been thrust into a legal dispute with the estate of legendary country musician Johnny Cash over claims of unauthorized use of his music on her latest album. The Cash family attorney has filed a writ of desistance, a legal action that seeks to halt the payment of any royalties related to the album until a judge can determine whether the music in question violates the Johnny Cash trademark.

The controversy centers around a segment in the song “Blackbird” from Beyoncé’s new album, where she hums a tune that the Cash estate believes closely resembles Cash’s iconic song “Walkin’ the Line.” According to sources, the Cash estate asserts that Beyoncé did not seek the necessary permission to incorporate the melody and argues that her use of the tune is a breach of copyright.

The estate’s lawyer emphasized the importance of upholding Johnny Cash’s musical legacy and intellectual property rights. “There’s a portion in ‘Blackbird’ that, when you listen closely, bears a striking resemblance to Johnny Cash’s ‘Walkin’ the Line.’ Beyoncé never sought permission to use this part, and we believe it infringes upon our client’s trademark,” the attorney stated.

In response, Beyoncé’s PR Director, Joe Barron, dismissed the claims as unfounded and far-fetched. Barron stated that Beyoncé had received explicit permission from Sir Paul McCartney, the original writer of the song “Blackbird,” to use the song in her album. “The idea that Beyoncé’s ‘Blackbird’ sounds like Johnny Cash’s ‘Walkin’ the Line’ is simply absurd,” said Barron. “What exactly are they smoking down there in  Memphis, anyway?”

Barron further argued that the claim is a desperate attempt to exploit Beyoncé’s success and that there is no merit to the allegations. He emphasized that the creative process behind “Blackbird” involved obtaining the necessary permissions from the rightful owners and that the song’s structure and arrangement were developed independently of any Johnny Cash material.

The case raises important questions about the intersection of musical inspiration and intellectual property rights. Artists often draw inspiration from different sources, and the line between homage and infringement can sometimes be blurred. Legal disputes such as this one highlight the challenges musicians face when incorporating elements of others’ work into their own creations.



As the legal battle unfolds, industry experts will be closely monitoring the outcome, which could have significant implications for both Beyoncé and the Cash estate. The situation also serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in navigating the world of music copyright and the importance of obtaining the proper permissions when using material from other artists.

Neither Johnny Cash nor Elvis Presley could comment on the situation, leaving it up to the courts to decide whether Beyoncé’s use of the contested music is a tribute to the late country legend or a violation of his trademark.

PROMOTED CONTENT