Does Taylor’s album contain elements of violence? How does the reviewer assess it?
Paste magazine made a bold decision to withhold the name of the writer in their review of Taylor Swift’s “The Tortured Poets Department” album. This move was prompted by disturbing “threats of violence” received by the writer after a review of one of Swift’s previous albums.
In an Editor’s Note, the publication stated, “There is no byline on this review due to how, in 2019 when Paste reviewed ‘Lover,’ the writer was sent threats of violence from readers who disagreed with the work.” Clearly prioritizing the safety of their staff over a mere byline, Paste magazine took a stand against online harassment and intimidation.
This action not only underscores the serious issue of online threats and harassment faced by writers but also highlights the publication’s commitment to protecting its employees. It’s a reminder that freedom of expression should never come at the cost of personal safety.
Paste Magazine removed the byline from their review of Taylor Swift’s “The Tortured Poets Department” album due to fans sending “threats of violence.”
In an intriguing twist, Paste magazine published a review of Taylor Swift’s “The Tortured Poets Department” album under the ambiguous byline “Paste Staff,” opting once again to shield the writer’s identity. The review, however, didn’t pull punches, challenging Swift’s songwriting prowess on her 11th studio release.
The clandestine critic didn’t hold back, particularly targeting Swift’s latest single, “Fortnight,” featuring Post Malone. According to the review, the track stumbled over its own lack of clarity, with harsh criticism directed at producer Jack Antonoff’s backing instrumental and what was described as Post Malone’s “out-of-place” vocal harmonies reminiscent of a Y2K-era teen dramedy.
The review’s bold statements ignited a buzz across social media, prompting discussions among fans and critics alike about the merits of Swift’s latest musical endeavor. Once again, Paste magazine’s decision to prioritize the safety of its writers while delivering candid critiques showcased their commitment to journalistic integrity in the face of potential backlash.
“The writer was sent threats of violence from readers who disagreed with the work,” a Paste Magazine editor wrote via X.
A critic wrote in the “TTPD” review that the album was Swift’s “worst lyricism to date.”
The mysterious critic didn’t mince words, pointing out what they deemed as Swift’s lyrical missteps on her latest album. Quoting a line from one of the tracks, “I took the miracle move-on drug, the effects were temporary,” the critic sarcastically questioned Swift’s status as “songwriter of the century,” suggesting that perhaps it’s time to “open the schools.”
Furthermore, the review didn’t shy away from labeling Swift’s latest lyrical efforts as her “worst lyricism to date,” delivering a cutting blow to the billionaire singer’s reputation as a wordsmith.
Despite the scathing critique, the critic acknowledged that while Swift may no longer feel the need to strive for excellence, “The Tortured Poets Department” wouldn’t necessarily be a failure for her. This nuanced analysis added depth to the review, sparking debates among fans and industry insiders alike about Swift’s artistic evolution and the expectations placed upon her as one of the biggest names in music.
The review concluded with a stark observation: no matter the critical reception, Swift’s star power ensures she’ll continue to fill arenas and dominate streaming platforms until she decides to exit the industry—although the notion of quitting doesn’t seem to align with her career trajectory.
Meanwhile, in the comments section of Paste Magazine’s explanation for their decision to remove the byline, a heated debate ensued. Some applauded the magazine for prioritizing the safety of its writers, while others questioned whether anonymity was the right approach in the face of criticism, sparking a broader conversation about journalistic integrity and the responsibilities of media outlets in the digital age.
Though the magazine said Swift “no longer feels challenged to be good,” they acknowledge that “TTPD” will “not be a net loss” for her.
On the project, the “Cruel Summer” singer took aim at Kim Kardashian and talked about her past romances.
The comment section buzzed with varied opinions. One reader criticized the review’s focus on Taylor’s personal life rather than her music, urging for a more substantial critique. Another echoed the sentiment, lamenting the absence of a genuine music review and branding the piece as mere gossip.
However, amidst the dissent, a voice of understanding emerged. Acknowledging disagreement with the review’s content, one commenter expressed respect for Paste Magazine’s decision to safeguard its staff from online harassment, affirming that no one should be subjected to persecution for expressing their opinions on art. This nuanced exchange highlighted the complexities of balancing journalistic critique with the protection of individual writers in the digital landscape.
The Tortured Poets Department” was released on Friday.
Despite the critical review from Paste Magazine, “TTPD” made waves in the music industry by smashing records. It reportedly became the first album to rack up over 300 million Spotify streams in a single day.
Within the album, Swift didn’t hold back, taking aim at public figures like Kim Kardashian while also delving into her personal relationships with Joe Alwyn and Matty Healy.
In response to the historic achievement, Swift celebrated in her own style, sharing an intimate home video with her devoted fans on Friday. This moment of connection and appreciation highlighted the bond between the artist and her audience, solidifying Swift’s status as a force to be reckoned with in the music world.
